<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (6) TMI 259 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438685</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a State Level Nodal Agency, determining that grants received for specific infrastructure projects were not income under sections 11(1)(d) and 12(1) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal held that the grants were not part of the appellant&#039;s corpus, were not income, and were not voluntary contributions. Consequently, the additions made by the Assessing Officer and CIT(A) were overturned, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2023 08:50:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=715756" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (6) TMI 259 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438685</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a State Level Nodal Agency, determining that grants received for specific infrastructure projects were not income under sections 11(1)(d) and 12(1) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal held that the grants were not part of the appellant&#039;s corpus, were not income, and were not voluntary contributions. Consequently, the additions made by the Assessing Officer and CIT(A) were overturned, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438685</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>