<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (6) TMI 256 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438682</link>
    <description>The CIT(A) deleted the addition made by the A.O, ruling that the grape sales by the assessee to Sula Vineyards Pvt. Ltd. were not inflated. The ITSC found a 6.6% inflation rate, lower than claimed, based on various evidence. The appeals by the revenue were dismissed, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision. Additional appeals with identical facts were also rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2023 13:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=715753" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (6) TMI 256 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438682</link>
      <description>The CIT(A) deleted the addition made by the A.O, ruling that the grape sales by the assessee to Sula Vineyards Pvt. Ltd. were not inflated. The ITSC found a 6.6% inflation rate, lower than claimed, based on various evidence. The appeals by the revenue were dismissed, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision. Additional appeals with identical facts were also rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438682</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>