<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (6) TMI 250 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438676</link>
    <description>The Court found the writ petition challenging the constitutional validity of Section 37A of the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 maintainable on grounds of violation of Article 14. However, the challenge was rejected as Section 37A was deemed not manifestly arbitrary. The petitioner was directed to appeal before the Tribunal under Section 37A(5) of FEMA. The writ petition was rejected, allowing the petitioner to pursue the statutory remedy of appeal within 30 days.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2023 08:50:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=715747" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (6) TMI 250 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438676</link>
      <description>The Court found the writ petition challenging the constitutional validity of Section 37A of the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 maintainable on grounds of violation of Article 14. However, the challenge was rejected as Section 37A was deemed not manifestly arbitrary. The petitioner was directed to appeal before the Tribunal under Section 37A(5) of FEMA. The writ petition was rejected, allowing the petitioner to pursue the statutory remedy of appeal within 30 days.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438676</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>