https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438675 The Court held that the impugned order did not violate principles of natural justice as officers of the same rank can adjudicate without bias. Regarding jurisdiction, the Deputy Director was competent to issue the order as the amount involved fell within his authority. The Court deemed the writ petitions not maintainable, advising the Petitioners to seek remedy through an appeal under Section 17(2) of the Act. The petitions were dismissed, allowing the Petitioners to raise their issues in the appeal process. en-us Mon, 17 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 07 Jun 2023 08:50:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438675 The Court held that the impugned order did not violate principles of natural justice as officers of the same rank can adjudicate without bias. Regarding jurisdiction, the Deputy Director was competent to issue the order as the amount involved fell within his authority. The Court deemed the writ petitions not maintainable, advising the Petitioners to seek remedy through an appeal under Section 17(2) of the Act. The petitions were dismissed, allowing the Petitioners to raise their issues in the appeal process. Case-Laws FEMA Mon, 17 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438675