<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (6) TMI 243 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438669</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that the demands for service tax on both the incentives received from the manufacturer and the reimbursable advertisement expenses were not sustainable. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with consequential reliefs as per law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2023 10:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=715739" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (6) TMI 243 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438669</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that the demands for service tax on both the incentives received from the manufacturer and the reimbursable advertisement expenses were not sustainable. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with consequential reliefs as per law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438669</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>