<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (6) TMI 242 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438668</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, determining that the Appellant is entitled to Cenvat Credit for input services utilized in creating immovable property. Additionally, the distribution of the credit to other units without following the prorata distribution principle was deemed acceptable for the period preceding 01.04.2012.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2023 08:49:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=715738" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (6) TMI 242 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438668</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, determining that the Appellant is entitled to Cenvat Credit for input services utilized in creating immovable property. Additionally, the distribution of the credit to other units without following the prorata distribution principle was deemed acceptable for the period preceding 01.04.2012.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438668</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>