<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (6) TMI 240 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438666</link>
    <description>Retrospective exemption under s.97 of the Finance Act, 2012 read with Not. 24/2009-ST was held to cover management, maintenance or repair of roads for 16.06.2005 to 26.07.2009, and no distinction between private and public roads was warranted; the service tax demand under this head was therefore set aside. Service tax on hire charges for JCBs/tippers raised under &quot;maintenance or repair service&quot; for 2005-06 to 2007-08 was held not maintainable because &quot;supply of tangible goods&quot; became taxable only from 16.05.2008 and, in any event, the underlying road repair service was exempt; the demand was set aside and extended period/penalties were not sustained for this head. Site formation/earthmoving was found proved and taxable under s.65(97a), with suppression justifying extended limitation; demand and s.78 penalty were sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2026 14:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=715735" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (6) TMI 240 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438666</link>
      <description>Retrospective exemption under s.97 of the Finance Act, 2012 read with Not. 24/2009-ST was held to cover management, maintenance or repair of roads for 16.06.2005 to 26.07.2009, and no distinction between private and public roads was warranted; the service tax demand under this head was therefore set aside. Service tax on hire charges for JCBs/tippers raised under &quot;maintenance or repair service&quot; for 2005-06 to 2007-08 was held not maintainable because &quot;supply of tangible goods&quot; became taxable only from 16.05.2008 and, in any event, the underlying road repair service was exempt; the demand was set aside and extended period/penalties were not sustained for this head. Site formation/earthmoving was found proved and taxable under s.65(97a), with suppression justifying extended limitation; demand and s.78 penalty were sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438666</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>