<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 1639 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308193</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the additions made by the Assessing Officer under various sections of the Income-tax Act, 1961, including Section 68 for unproven identity of share capital contributors and Section 14A disallowance. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of credible evidence to substantiate transactions and expenditure, ultimately dismissing the assessee&#039;s appeals and affirming the Assessing Officer&#039;s decisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2023 20:48:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=715717" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 1639 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308193</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the additions made by the Assessing Officer under various sections of the Income-tax Act, 1961, including Section 68 for unproven identity of share capital contributors and Section 14A disallowance. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of credible evidence to substantiate transactions and expenditure, ultimately dismissing the assessee&#039;s appeals and affirming the Assessing Officer&#039;s decisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308193</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>