<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 2001 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308202</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals in Civil Appeal Nos. 4965-4966 of 2016 as the issues raised were already settled in a previous judgment. In Civil Appeal No. 16991 of 2017, the first issue regarding the coverage of the respondent under the Service Tax Act was left pending for decision, while the second issue on the valuation of the service tax had been resolved in favor of the respondent based on a previous judgment. The Court ordered the first issue to be tagged along with another case for further consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2023 20:48:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=715711" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 2001 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308202</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals in Civil Appeal Nos. 4965-4966 of 2016 as the issues raised were already settled in a previous judgment. In Civil Appeal No. 16991 of 2017, the first issue regarding the coverage of the respondent under the Service Tax Act was left pending for decision, while the second issue on the valuation of the service tax had been resolved in favor of the respondent based on a previous judgment. The Court ordered the first issue to be tagged along with another case for further consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308202</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>