<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (3) TMI 1827 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308192</link>
    <description>The petition was allowed, setting aside the order dated 1st December 2009. The judgment emphasized the importance of proper jurisdiction, adherence to legal provisions, and distinguishing between actions falling within official duties and those warranting criminal charges.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2023 17:15:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=715701" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (3) TMI 1827 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308192</link>
      <description>The petition was allowed, setting aside the order dated 1st December 2009. The judgment emphasized the importance of proper jurisdiction, adherence to legal provisions, and distinguishing between actions falling within official duties and those warranting criminal charges.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308192</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>