https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308189 The Supreme Court held that government sanction under s. 106 of the Madras Act was not necessary for prosecuting the appellant under s. 409 of the Indian Penal Code. The Court emphasized that the appellant's cessation of office made the Collector's sanction adequate. It clarified that not every offence by a public servant requires government sanction, only those directly linked to official duties. The Court affirmed that the appellant's conviction was valid despite the absence of government sanction, dismissing both appeals. en-us Mon, 29 Aug 1966 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 06 Jun 2023 16:55:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308189 The Supreme Court held that government sanction under s. 106 of the Madras Act was not necessary for prosecuting the appellant under s. 409 of the Indian Penal Code. The Court emphasized that the appellant's cessation of office made the Collector's sanction adequate. It clarified that not every offence by a public servant requires government sanction, only those directly linked to official duties. The Court affirmed that the appellant's conviction was valid despite the absence of government sanction, dismissing both appeals. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 29 Aug 1966 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308189