https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308186 The High Court allowed the trial to proceed against the respondent, emphasizing that the necessity of sanction under Sec. 197 can be raised during the trial if relevant material emerges. The Court found that the Addl. Sessions Judge had not properly evaluated crucial evidence, including reports that contradicted the initial findings. It was determined that stalling the prosecution would be incorrect, and the trial should continue independently. The petition was granted, and the rule was upheld. en-us Tue, 25 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 06 Jun 2023 15:42:07 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308186 The High Court allowed the trial to proceed against the respondent, emphasizing that the necessity of sanction under Sec. 197 can be raised during the trial if relevant material emerges. The Court found that the Addl. Sessions Judge had not properly evaluated crucial evidence, including reports that contradicted the initial findings. It was determined that stalling the prosecution would be incorrect, and the trial should continue independently. The petition was granted, and the rule was upheld. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 25 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308186