https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308185 The court found the dismissal order and the subsequent appellate order to be illegal and lacking jurisdiction due to being passed by an authority subordinate to the appointing authority without delegation of power. It held that the respondent-Company's actions are amenable to writ jurisdiction under Article 226, citing violations of natural justice in the disciplinary proceedings. The court concluded that the respondent-Company qualifies as "State" under Article 12 and ordered the reinstatement of the petitioner with back-wages and benefits, rejecting the suggestion of compensation over reinstatement to deter unfair termination practices. en-us Wed, 27 Nov 1996 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 06 Jun 2023 15:15:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308185 The court found the dismissal order and the subsequent appellate order to be illegal and lacking jurisdiction due to being passed by an authority subordinate to the appointing authority without delegation of power. It held that the respondent-Company's actions are amenable to writ jurisdiction under Article 226, citing violations of natural justice in the disciplinary proceedings. The court concluded that the respondent-Company qualifies as "State" under Article 12 and ordered the reinstatement of the petitioner with back-wages and benefits, rejecting the suggestion of compensation over reinstatement to deter unfair termination practices. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 27 Nov 1996 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308185