<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (4) TMI 820 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308183</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to verify if the Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) amount was offered in A.Y. 2008-09 when the projects were completed. The Tribunal emphasized recognizing income from the sale of TDR in line with project completion, following the Project Completion Method of accounting.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2023 10:53:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=715664" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (4) TMI 820 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308183</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to verify if the Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) amount was offered in A.Y. 2008-09 when the projects were completed. The Tribunal emphasized recognizing income from the sale of TDR in line with project completion, following the Project Completion Method of accounting.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308183</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>