<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (6) TMI 232 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438658</link>
    <description>HC ruled that a bank account freezing order under Section 83 of CGST Act becomes inoperative after one year. The court directed the bank to unfreeze the petitioner&#039;s account based on an outdated communication dated 10.03.2021. The judgment also mandated disclosure of any additional undisclosed orders affecting the account and preserved the petitioner&#039;s rights to seek further remedies.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2025 11:38:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=715652" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (6) TMI 232 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438658</link>
      <description>HC ruled that a bank account freezing order under Section 83 of CGST Act becomes inoperative after one year. The court directed the bank to unfreeze the petitioner&#039;s account based on an outdated communication dated 10.03.2021. The judgment also mandated disclosure of any additional undisclosed orders affecting the account and preserved the petitioner&#039;s rights to seek further remedies.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438658</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>