https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438622 The Tribunal largely allowed the dispensation of meetings for a proposed merger but required a meeting for a sole secured creditor. It directed in-person voting for creditors, contrary to provisions allowing proxies. The appellant highlighted clerical errors in the order that needed correction. The Tribunal's authority to dispense with creditor meetings was emphasized, and its error in disallowing proxy voting was noted. The impugned order was set aside for further proceedings before the Tribunal to ensure compliance with relevant laws and rules regarding meetings and voting procedures under the Companies Act, 2013. en-us Fri, 02 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 05 Jun 2023 15:51:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438622 The Tribunal largely allowed the dispensation of meetings for a proposed merger but required a meeting for a sole secured creditor. It directed in-person voting for creditors, contrary to provisions allowing proxies. The appellant highlighted clerical errors in the order that needed correction. The Tribunal's authority to dispense with creditor meetings was emphasized, and its error in disallowing proxy voting was noted. The impugned order was set aside for further proceedings before the Tribunal to ensure compliance with relevant laws and rules regarding meetings and voting procedures under the Companies Act, 2013. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 02 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438622