<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (6) TMI 194 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438620</link>
    <description>The Tribunal affirmed the decision of the Adjudicating Authority, ruling that the transfer of assets among group companies did not amount to fraudulent trading under Section 66(1) of IBC, 2016. The Appellant&#039;s arguments regarding fraudulent intentions and lack of consideration of documentary evidence were not substantiated, leading to the dismissal of the appeal without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2023 08:41:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=715613" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (6) TMI 194 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438620</link>
      <description>The Tribunal affirmed the decision of the Adjudicating Authority, ruling that the transfer of assets among group companies did not amount to fraudulent trading under Section 66(1) of IBC, 2016. The Appellant&#039;s arguments regarding fraudulent intentions and lack of consideration of documentary evidence were not substantiated, leading to the dismissal of the appeal without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438620</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>