<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (6) TMI 193 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438619</link>
    <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, finding that the services provided were eligible for exemption under Notification No. 17/2005-S.T. as they were rendered to a Government organization. The tribunal also held that the demand was time-barred and that the tax liability on the unreceived amount was incorrect. Consequently, the impugned orders were set aside, and the appeals were allowed with consequential benefits as per law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2023 08:41:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=715612" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (6) TMI 193 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438619</link>
      <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, finding that the services provided were eligible for exemption under Notification No. 17/2005-S.T. as they were rendered to a Government organization. The tribunal also held that the demand was time-barred and that the tax liability on the unreceived amount was incorrect. Consequently, the impugned orders were set aside, and the appeals were allowed with consequential benefits as per law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438619</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>