<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (6) TMI 190 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438616</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, confirming the goods&#039; classification under chapter heading 5909 and upholding the benefit of Notification No. 175/86 dated 01.03.1986 for the Appellants. The demand notice was set aside due to both the merit of classification and the limitation issue, as the Tribunal found no suppression of fact and the notice was hit by limitation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2023 08:41:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=715608" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (6) TMI 190 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438616</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, confirming the goods&#039; classification under chapter heading 5909 and upholding the benefit of Notification No. 175/86 dated 01.03.1986 for the Appellants. The demand notice was set aside due to both the merit of classification and the limitation issue, as the Tribunal found no suppression of fact and the notice was hit by limitation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438616</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>