<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (1) TMI 177 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32923</link>
    <description>Penalties under the service tax law were held unsustainable where the show cause notice did not contain a meaningful allegation of suppression or intent to evade tax, and the assessee showed reasonable cause. The assessee accepted liability for the service tax demand, so the demand was sustained on that concession. However, in the absence of the required allegation and statutory basis for penalty, the penalties were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 May 2010 10:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=71560" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (1) TMI 177 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32923</link>
      <description>Penalties under the service tax law were held unsustainable where the show cause notice did not contain a meaningful allegation of suppression or intent to evade tax, and the assessee showed reasonable cause. The assessee accepted liability for the service tax demand, so the demand was sustained on that concession. However, in the absence of the required allegation and statutory basis for penalty, the penalties were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32923</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>