<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (3) TMI 1368 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308179</link>
    <description>HC allowed writ petition challenging registration cancellation and appeal dismissal. The court found the original order lacked proper application of mind and violated natural justice principles. The impugned orders were set aside, and the matter was remanded to the adjudicating authority to pass a fresh order within three months, ensuring fair hearing opportunity for the petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2025 16:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=715591" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (3) TMI 1368 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308179</link>
      <description>HC allowed writ petition challenging registration cancellation and appeal dismissal. The court found the original order lacked proper application of mind and violated natural justice principles. The impugned orders were set aside, and the matter was remanded to the adjudicating authority to pass a fresh order within three months, ensuring fair hearing opportunity for the petitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308179</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>