<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (7) TMI 294 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32922</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in a case concerning a dispute over Service tax on Photographic Services. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of following established legal principles and Tribunal rulings, setting aside the lower authorities&#039; decision and providing relief to the appellant. The judgment underscored the binding nature of Tribunal rulings on lower authorities and the necessity for consistency and adherence to settled legal positions in tax disputes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 16:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=71559" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (7) TMI 294 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32922</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in a case concerning a dispute over Service tax on Photographic Services. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of following established legal principles and Tribunal rulings, setting aside the lower authorities&#039; decision and providing relief to the appellant. The judgment underscored the binding nature of Tribunal rulings on lower authorities and the necessity for consistency and adherence to settled legal positions in tax disputes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32922</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>