<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (6) TMI 186 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438612</link>
    <description>Anticipatory bail was declined where the High Court found that the GST number, firm name and other particulars were fabricated and the records were non-existent. In view of those findings and the role attributed to the accused, the Court held that no case for grant of anticipatory bail was made out. The Special Leave Petitions were dismissed and the pending applications were disposed of.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2025 12:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=715562" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (6) TMI 186 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438612</link>
      <description>Anticipatory bail was declined where the High Court found that the GST number, firm name and other particulars were fabricated and the records were non-existent. In view of those findings and the role attributed to the accused, the Court held that no case for grant of anticipatory bail was made out. The Special Leave Petitions were dismissed and the pending applications were disposed of.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438612</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>