<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (6) TMI 176 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438602</link>
    <description>Receipts from pre-clinical laboratory testing and research services were not taxable in India as fees for included services or fees for technical services under the India-USA DTAA because the customers received only final reports and were not enabled to independently apply the provider&#039;s technical knowledge, skill, know-how or processes. The agreements showed that the provider retained ownership of its inventions, techniques, scientific data and test procedures, so the &quot;make available&quot; test in Article 12(4)(b) was not met. In the absence of a permanent establishment in India, the receipts also could not be assessed as business profits under Article 7, and the related tax addition was unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2025 11:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=715552" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (6) TMI 176 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438602</link>
      <description>Receipts from pre-clinical laboratory testing and research services were not taxable in India as fees for included services or fees for technical services under the India-USA DTAA because the customers received only final reports and were not enabled to independently apply the provider&#039;s technical knowledge, skill, know-how or processes. The agreements showed that the provider retained ownership of its inventions, techniques, scientific data and test procedures, so the &quot;make available&quot; test in Article 12(4)(b) was not met. In the absence of a permanent establishment in India, the receipts also could not be assessed as business profits under Article 7, and the related tax addition was unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438602</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>