<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (6) TMI 162 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438588</link>
    <description>Once export obligation under an advance authorisation scheme is fulfilled and the bond is redeemed by the licensing authority, Customs cannot sustain duty demand, confiscation or penalty merely on an asserted breach of authorisation conditions. Here, the imported goods were lost in transit, the loss was intimated, the quantity was replaced locally, and the export obligation was completed without rebate or drawback. The HC found no violation of Notification No. 93/2004-Cus and no legal infirmity in the Tribunal&#039;s appreciation of evidence, so the duty demand, redemption fine and penalty were held unsustainable and the appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Jun 2023 08:31:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=715535" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (6) TMI 162 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438588</link>
      <description>Once export obligation under an advance authorisation scheme is fulfilled and the bond is redeemed by the licensing authority, Customs cannot sustain duty demand, confiscation or penalty merely on an asserted breach of authorisation conditions. Here, the imported goods were lost in transit, the loss was intimated, the quantity was replaced locally, and the export obligation was completed without rebate or drawback. The HC found no violation of Notification No. 93/2004-Cus and no legal infirmity in the Tribunal&#039;s appreciation of evidence, so the duty demand, redemption fine and penalty were held unsustainable and the appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438588</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>