<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (6) TMI 160 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438586</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal challenging the revocation of the customs broker license and penalties imposed due to discrepancies in shipping bills for the export of goods. The Tribunal found the penalties disproportionate to the alleged breaches, emphasizing that the discrepancies did not significantly impact the export process, leading to the setting aside of the impugned order for lack of substantial evidence supporting the charges against the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Jun 2023 08:30:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=715530" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (6) TMI 160 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438586</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal challenging the revocation of the customs broker license and penalties imposed due to discrepancies in shipping bills for the export of goods. The Tribunal found the penalties disproportionate to the alleged breaches, emphasizing that the discrepancies did not significantly impact the export process, leading to the setting aside of the impugned order for lack of substantial evidence supporting the charges against the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438586</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>