<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (6) TMI 140 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438566</link>
    <description>The High Court set aside the rejection of the petitioner&#039;s application for benefits under the Karasamadhana Scheme, directing the Authority to reconsider the application. The Court emphasized the need for clarity on the interpretation of Scheme provisions and the impact of subsequent recoveries on eligibility for refund. The Authority was instructed to reassess the application considering all contentions and specific circumstances before passing fresh orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Jun 2023 08:29:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=715498" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (6) TMI 140 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438566</link>
      <description>The High Court set aside the rejection of the petitioner&#039;s application for benefits under the Karasamadhana Scheme, directing the Authority to reconsider the application. The Court emphasized the need for clarity on the interpretation of Scheme provisions and the impact of subsequent recoveries on eligibility for refund. The Authority was instructed to reassess the application considering all contentions and specific circumstances before passing fresh orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438566</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>