<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (1) TMI 1373 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308158</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court confirmed the applicability of the Central Educational Institutions (Reservation in Admission) Amendment Act, 2012 to Manipur University. It upheld reservation norms of 2% for SC candidates, 31% for ST candidates, and 17% for OBC candidates. Ordinances prescribing different percentages were deemed invalid. The interpretation of the second proviso to Section 3 was clarified to ensure reservation percentages align with pre-Amendment Act figures. The Amendment Act aimed to reconcile reservation caps and address challenges in implementing reservation in North Eastern States. The Court dismissed the appeal, affirming Manipur University&#039;s obligation to follow the specified reservation norms.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Jun 2023 19:47:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=715495" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (1) TMI 1373 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308158</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court confirmed the applicability of the Central Educational Institutions (Reservation in Admission) Amendment Act, 2012 to Manipur University. It upheld reservation norms of 2% for SC candidates, 31% for ST candidates, and 17% for OBC candidates. Ordinances prescribing different percentages were deemed invalid. The interpretation of the second proviso to Section 3 was clarified to ensure reservation percentages align with pre-Amendment Act figures. The Amendment Act aimed to reconcile reservation caps and address challenges in implementing reservation in North Eastern States. The Court dismissed the appeal, affirming Manipur University&#039;s obligation to follow the specified reservation norms.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308158</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>