https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308157 The Supreme Court clarified that Section 37 of the Architects Act prohibits unregistered individuals from using the title "Architect" but not from practicing architecture. It upheld NOIDA's Promotion Policy 2005, allowing promotions to the post of Associate Architect without an architecture degree. However, it ruled that individuals without recognized architecture qualifications cannot be titled as "Architect" or "Associate Architect." The prohibition on using the title extends to government employees, ensuring uniform application of the Architects Act. NOIDA was directed to adjust post titles to comply with the Act. en-us Tue, 17 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 04 Jun 2023 19:47:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308157 The Supreme Court clarified that Section 37 of the Architects Act prohibits unregistered individuals from using the title "Architect" but not from practicing architecture. It upheld NOIDA's Promotion Policy 2005, allowing promotions to the post of Associate Architect without an architecture degree. However, it ruled that individuals without recognized architecture qualifications cannot be titled as "Architect" or "Associate Architect." The prohibition on using the title extends to government employees, ensuring uniform application of the Architects Act. NOIDA was directed to adjust post titles to comply with the Act. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 17 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308157