<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (6) TMI 138 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438564</link>
    <description>HC denied anticipatory bail to accused in fraud case involving alleged financial misconduct. Evidence suggested active participation in fraudulent activities, fabricated documents, and potential misappropriation of goods. Court determined custodial investigation necessary to uncover complete facts. Bail applications rejected under Section 438 Cr.P.C. due to strong prima facie case against petitioners.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2025 13:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=715485" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (6) TMI 138 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438564</link>
      <description>HC denied anticipatory bail to accused in fraud case involving alleged financial misconduct. Evidence suggested active participation in fraudulent activities, fabricated documents, and potential misappropriation of goods. Court determined custodial investigation necessary to uncover complete facts. Bail applications rejected under Section 438 Cr.P.C. due to strong prima facie case against petitioners.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438564</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>