<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1965 (12) TMI 156 - PUNJAB HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308151</link>
    <description>The court interpreted Section 2(3) proviso (ii)(a) of the Punjab Security of Land Tenures Act, 1953, determining that a displaced person can retain a minimum of 50 standard acres or a maximum of 100 ordinary acres based on the initial allotment type. It emphasized legislative intent, avoiding absurd results. The court overruled conflicting judgments and upheld the permissible area for displaced persons, quashing orders reducing holdings below 50 standard acres.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 1965 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Jun 2023 12:21:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=715477" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1965 (12) TMI 156 - PUNJAB HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308151</link>
      <description>The court interpreted Section 2(3) proviso (ii)(a) of the Punjab Security of Land Tenures Act, 1953, determining that a displaced person can retain a minimum of 50 standard acres or a maximum of 100 ordinary acres based on the initial allotment type. It emphasized legislative intent, avoiding absurd results. The court overruled conflicting judgments and upheld the permissible area for displaced persons, quashing orders reducing holdings below 50 standard acres.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 1965 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308151</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>