https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308150 A State appeal in a jury trial was not invalid merely because the memorandum of appeal stated only general grounds that the acquittal was against the weight of evidence and contrary to law; the Code required a written memorandum with the judgment and, in jury cases, the heads of charge, but did not make detailed grounds a condition of validity. By contrast, the trial was treated as no trial in law because two jurors lacked sufficient English to understand the documentary evidence and determine authorship issues, so the accused was denied an essential safeguard of a lawful jury trial. The conviction and sentences were therefore set aside. en-us Mon, 14 Oct 1957 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 03 Jun 2023 11:28:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308150 A State appeal in a jury trial was not invalid merely because the memorandum of appeal stated only general grounds that the acquittal was against the weight of evidence and contrary to law; the Code required a written memorandum with the judgment and, in jury cases, the heads of charge, but did not make detailed grounds a condition of validity. By contrast, the trial was treated as no trial in law because two jurors lacked sufficient English to understand the documentary evidence and determine authorship issues, so the accused was denied an essential safeguard of a lawful jury trial. The conviction and sentences were therefore set aside. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 14 Oct 1957 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308150