<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (6) TMI 133 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438559</link>
    <description>The court found the reopening of the assessment invalid due to inadequate reasons recorded. The addition under Section 68 was deemed unjustified as the share premium received was considered a capital receipt. The court concluded that the appellant had fulfilled all conditions to prove the credit, rendering Section 68 inapplicable. The share premium received was not considered real income, leading to the appeal being allowed in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Jun 2023 08:55:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=715462" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (6) TMI 133 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438559</link>
      <description>The court found the reopening of the assessment invalid due to inadequate reasons recorded. The addition under Section 68 was deemed unjustified as the share premium received was considered a capital receipt. The court concluded that the appellant had fulfilled all conditions to prove the credit, rendering Section 68 inapplicable. The share premium received was not considered real income, leading to the appeal being allowed in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438559</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>