https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308146 Exercise of adjudicatory power under Section 86(1)(f) of the Electricity Act, 2003 requires a properly constituted Commission with a member having knowledge of law; orders passed when no Judicial Member was available were treated as coram non judice and void for want of jurisdiction. The objection was not cured by the petitioner's participation or delay because jurisdiction cannot be conferred by consent, waiver, estoppel or acquiescence. The writ petition succeeded, the impugned Commission orders were quashed, and the matter was left open for fresh consideration in accordance with law. en-us Mon, 14 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 02 Jun 2023 20:39:07 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308146 Exercise of adjudicatory power under Section 86(1)(f) of the Electricity Act, 2003 requires a properly constituted Commission with a member having knowledge of law; orders passed when no Judicial Member was available were treated as coram non judice and void for want of jurisdiction. The objection was not cured by the petitioner's participation or delay because jurisdiction cannot be conferred by consent, waiver, estoppel or acquiescence. The writ petition succeeded, the impugned Commission orders were quashed, and the matter was left open for fresh consideration in accordance with law. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 14 Jun 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308146