<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (3) TMI 828 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308142</link>
    <description>Citation records an appeal in a central excise dispute titled Commissioner v Dora Processors; the apex court admitted the civil appeals, and the excerpt supplies only the procedural admission and citation details without any substantive reasoning, factual findings, statutory interpretation, or legal tests. The document serves as a reference to the reported order rather than stating holdings, operative legal principles, remedies, or clarified standards applicable to central excise law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2023 11:22:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=715365" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (3) TMI 828 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308142</link>
      <description>Citation records an appeal in a central excise dispute titled Commissioner v Dora Processors; the apex court admitted the civil appeals, and the excerpt supplies only the procedural admission and citation details without any substantive reasoning, factual findings, statutory interpretation, or legal tests. The document serves as a reference to the reported order rather than stating holdings, operative legal principles, remedies, or clarified standards applicable to central excise law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308142</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>