<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (11) TMI 700 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308139</link>
    <description>The court quashed the charges against the petitioners under sections 7 and 8 of the Kerala Gaming Act for playing cards in a private building. The court emphasized that the building being a private property and not a common gaming house was crucial. Referring to precedent, the court clarified that gaming in a private building is not an offense unless it is a common gaming house. As the petitioners were playing cards for profit in a private building, the court concluded their actions did not violate the Act. The court allowed the petitioners&#039; case, quashing the charges due to the absence of evidence of gaming in a common gaming house.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2023 09:50:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=715351" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (11) TMI 700 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308139</link>
      <description>The court quashed the charges against the petitioners under sections 7 and 8 of the Kerala Gaming Act for playing cards in a private building. The court emphasized that the building being a private property and not a common gaming house was crucial. Referring to precedent, the court clarified that gaming in a private building is not an offense unless it is a common gaming house. As the petitioners were playing cards for profit in a private building, the court concluded their actions did not violate the Act. The court allowed the petitioners&#039; case, quashing the charges due to the absence of evidence of gaming in a common gaming house.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308139</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>