<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (6) TMI 93 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438519</link>
    <description>Works contracts straddling the GST commencement date must be assessed by separating the pre-01.07.2017 and post-01.07.2017 components for tax purposes. The court accepted that the tax element is not a profit component and held that work executed before GST remained subject to the earlier regime, while work executed after GST commencement fell under GST. It further required contract-wise computation of the differential tax burden, with input tax credit and any necessary supplementary agreement taken into account, and directed reimbursement or adjustment where the revised GST-inclusive value exceeded the original contractual value.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2025 12:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=715346" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (6) TMI 93 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438519</link>
      <description>Works contracts straddling the GST commencement date must be assessed by separating the pre-01.07.2017 and post-01.07.2017 components for tax purposes. The court accepted that the tax element is not a profit component and held that work executed before GST remained subject to the earlier regime, while work executed after GST commencement fell under GST. It further required contract-wise computation of the differential tax burden, with input tax credit and any necessary supplementary agreement taken into account, and directed reimbursement or adjustment where the revised GST-inclusive value exceeded the original contractual value.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438519</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>