<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (6) TMI 89 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438515</link>
    <description>Assessment reopening premised on alleged unexplained cash credit from a sham lender failed because the lender&#039;s identity, genuineness and creditworthiness were established on the facts; consequently the advances could not be treated as unexplained credit and reassessment based on that premise was not supportable, resulting in the disallowance of the revenue&#039;s action and relief to the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2026 11:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=715342" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (6) TMI 89 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438515</link>
      <description>Assessment reopening premised on alleged unexplained cash credit from a sham lender failed because the lender&#039;s identity, genuineness and creditworthiness were established on the facts; consequently the advances could not be treated as unexplained credit and reassessment based on that premise was not supportable, resulting in the disallowance of the revenue&#039;s action and relief to the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438515</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>