<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (6) TMI 87 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438513</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal directed the AO to delete the addition made under section 68 of the Income Tax Act, acknowledging the lack of evidence linking the appellant to the alleged non-genuine transactions. The Tribunal allowed the appeal by the assessee, emphasizing the importance of establishing a clear nexus between the taxpayer and any fraudulent activities in tax assessments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2023 08:33:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=715340" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (6) TMI 87 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438513</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal directed the AO to delete the addition made under section 68 of the Income Tax Act, acknowledging the lack of evidence linking the appellant to the alleged non-genuine transactions. The Tribunal allowed the appeal by the assessee, emphasizing the importance of establishing a clear nexus between the taxpayer and any fraudulent activities in tax assessments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438513</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>