<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (6) TMI 77 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438503</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, annulling the assessment and deleting the addition of Rs.17,80,000 as unexplained income. The judgment emphasized the importance of tangible material for reassessment under section 147 and highlighted the necessity of providing the assessee with incriminating evidence for rebuttal before making additions to the income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2023 11:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=715330" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (6) TMI 77 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438503</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, annulling the assessment and deleting the addition of Rs.17,80,000 as unexplained income. The judgment emphasized the importance of tangible material for reassessment under section 147 and highlighted the necessity of providing the assessee with incriminating evidence for rebuttal before making additions to the income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438503</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>