<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (6) TMI 70 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438496</link>
    <description>Admission of the section 9 insolvency petition was upheld because debt and default were found to be established, while the corporate debtor failed to produce documentary support for any genuine pre-existing dispute. The Appellate Tribunal accepted the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s finding that the consultancy agreement was not shown to be void ab initio and that the alleged criminal and civil proceedings did not substantiate the dispute. Later settlement and withdrawal steps did not dislodge the original admission order on the record before the Tribunal, so the challenge to commencement of CIRP failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2023 21:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=715320" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (6) TMI 70 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438496</link>
      <description>Admission of the section 9 insolvency petition was upheld because debt and default were found to be established, while the corporate debtor failed to produce documentary support for any genuine pre-existing dispute. The Appellate Tribunal accepted the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s finding that the consultancy agreement was not shown to be void ab initio and that the alleged criminal and civil proceedings did not substantiate the dispute. Later settlement and withdrawal steps did not dislodge the original admission order on the record before the Tribunal, so the challenge to commencement of CIRP failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438496</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>