<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (6) TMI 68 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438494</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed both appeals, affirming the maintainability of the application under Section 7 of the IBC within the limitation period, validating simultaneous CIRP against both borrower and guarantor, and rejecting the discretionary power argument due to clear debt admission. The appeals were dismissed without any order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2023 21:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=715318" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (6) TMI 68 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438494</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed both appeals, affirming the maintainability of the application under Section 7 of the IBC within the limitation period, validating simultaneous CIRP against both borrower and guarantor, and rejecting the discretionary power argument due to clear debt admission. The appeals were dismissed without any order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438494</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>