<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (6) TMI 67 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438493</link>
    <description>Regular bail under section 439 CrPC read with section 45 PMLA was granted because the material on record did not show the petitioner&#039;s operative role in the alleged transactions. The Court noted that the company through which transactions were routed did not involve the petitioner as director or shareholder during the relevant period, the disputed invoices were not shown to have been issued by him, and the bail inquiry remained a prima facie assessment on broad probabilities. It also considered cooperation with investigation, completion of the complaint, absence of demonstrated risk of tampering, and parity, and found the twin conditions under section 45 satisfied in the petitioner&#039;s favour.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2023 10:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=715317" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (6) TMI 67 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438493</link>
      <description>Regular bail under section 439 CrPC read with section 45 PMLA was granted because the material on record did not show the petitioner&#039;s operative role in the alleged transactions. The Court noted that the company through which transactions were routed did not involve the petitioner as director or shareholder during the relevant period, the disputed invoices were not shown to have been issued by him, and the bail inquiry remained a prima facie assessment on broad probabilities. It also considered cooperation with investigation, completion of the complaint, absence of demonstrated risk of tampering, and parity, and found the twin conditions under section 45 satisfied in the petitioner&#039;s favour.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438493</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>