<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (6) TMI 66 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438492</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Appellant, holding that the cost of consumables used in photocopying services should not be included in the assessable value for Service Tax payment. The Appeals were allowed in part, overturning the demand for the extended period and associated interest. The Appellant was directed to pay the Service Tax for the regular period, with all penalties waived due to interpretational challenges surrounding the issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2023 15:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=715315" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (6) TMI 66 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438492</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Appellant, holding that the cost of consumables used in photocopying services should not be included in the assessable value for Service Tax payment. The Appeals were allowed in part, overturning the demand for the extended period and associated interest. The Appellant was directed to pay the Service Tax for the regular period, with all penalties waived due to interpretational challenges surrounding the issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438492</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>