<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Oral statements insufficient for duty demand without documentary evidence; lacks credibility u/s 9D. No substantial support for case.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=70087</link>
    <description>Reliance on the statement of the manager of the manufacturer for demand of duty - the presence of documentary evidences prevails over the oral statement which is not put to the test of examination and cross-examination as required under Section 9D. There is no evidence to support the case of the department. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2023 08:31:51 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2023 08:31:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=715307" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Oral statements insufficient for duty demand without documentary evidence; lacks credibility u/s 9D. No substantial support for case.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=70087</link>
      <description>Reliance on the statement of the manager of the manufacturer for demand of duty - the presence of documentary evidences prevails over the oral statement which is not put to the test of examination and cross-examination as required under Section 9D. There is no evidence to support the case of the department. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2023 08:31:51 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=70087</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>