<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (6) TMI 57 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438483</link>
    <description>The HC held that LAN connection cables (CAT-5, CAT-6) qualify as computer peripherals under Part-A of Schedule IV to the RVAT Act and are taxable at the rate specified therein, not under the general rate in Schedule V. The Court rejected the Revenue&#039;s narrow interpretation of &quot;peripherals,&quot; affirming an expansive meaning that includes networking cables used to expand computer system capabilities. Amendments to Schedule IV explicitly including such cables supported this view. The Court further ruled that reliance on HSN codes is limited and not determinative under the RVAT Act. The petitioner&#039;s claim that the goods fall under Schedule IV was accepted due to lack of contrary evidence from Revenue. The revision was allowed in favor of the petitioner-assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2025 14:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=715301" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (6) TMI 57 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438483</link>
      <description>The HC held that LAN connection cables (CAT-5, CAT-6) qualify as computer peripherals under Part-A of Schedule IV to the RVAT Act and are taxable at the rate specified therein, not under the general rate in Schedule V. The Court rejected the Revenue&#039;s narrow interpretation of &quot;peripherals,&quot; affirming an expansive meaning that includes networking cables used to expand computer system capabilities. Amendments to Schedule IV explicitly including such cables supported this view. The Court further ruled that reliance on HSN codes is limited and not determinative under the RVAT Act. The petitioner&#039;s claim that the goods fall under Schedule IV was accepted due to lack of contrary evidence from Revenue. The revision was allowed in favor of the petitioner-assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT / Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438483</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>