<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (6) TMI 56 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438482</link>
    <description>The court upheld the validity of service of appeal orders at the petitioner&#039;s old address, rejecting claims of address change. The dismissal of appeals by the Tribunal due to delay during the COVID-19 pandemic was affirmed, emphasizing the petitioner&#039;s failure to provide a sufficient explanation for the delay. The court&#039;s decision underscored the importance of adhering to procedural timelines, even in challenging circumstances like a pandemic.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2023 20:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=715299" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (6) TMI 56 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438482</link>
      <description>The court upheld the validity of service of appeal orders at the petitioner&#039;s old address, rejecting claims of address change. The dismissal of appeals by the Tribunal due to delay during the COVID-19 pandemic was affirmed, emphasizing the petitioner&#039;s failure to provide a sufficient explanation for the delay. The court&#039;s decision underscored the importance of adhering to procedural timelines, even in challenging circumstances like a pandemic.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438482</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>