<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (6) TMI 54 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438480</link>
    <description>Essential tender conditions in a statutory auction must be strictly complied with. The successful bidder&#039;s documents were held not to satisfy the requirement of producing the previous financial year&#039;s income tax return, and the GST no-dues document was not treated as a statutory, unconditional certificate. The decision to finalise the quarry settlement on the same day, despite the selection committee&#039;s own direction that the documents required verification and confirmation, was found inconsistent with the prescribed process and arbitrary. The impugned settlement was set aside, and the authorities were directed to conduct a fresh tender process in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2023 13:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=715296" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (6) TMI 54 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438480</link>
      <description>Essential tender conditions in a statutory auction must be strictly complied with. The successful bidder&#039;s documents were held not to satisfy the requirement of producing the previous financial year&#039;s income tax return, and the GST no-dues document was not treated as a statutory, unconditional certificate. The decision to finalise the quarry settlement on the same day, despite the selection committee&#039;s own direction that the documents required verification and confirmation, was found inconsistent with the prescribed process and arbitrary. The impugned settlement was set aside, and the authorities were directed to conduct a fresh tender process in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=438480</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>