<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (1) TMI 1257 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308135</link>
    <description>A fresh corporate insolvency resolution process could not be initiated against a corporate debtor already under an admitted CIRP, because the existence of the ongoing insolvency process barred a second proceeding against the same debtor. The petition was therefore not examined on merits and was disposed of as not maintainable. The petitioner was left at liberty to lodge its claim before the insolvency professional in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Jun 2023 20:36:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=715287" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (1) TMI 1257 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308135</link>
      <description>A fresh corporate insolvency resolution process could not be initiated against a corporate debtor already under an admitted CIRP, because the existence of the ongoing insolvency process barred a second proceeding against the same debtor. The petition was therefore not examined on merits and was disposed of as not maintainable. The petitioner was left at liberty to lodge its claim before the insolvency professional in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308135</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>