https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308137 The High Court addressed delays in cross-examining witnesses in multiple writ petitions. The Respondent Department denied responsibility for the delay, emphasizing the need to expedite appeals. The court highlighted the presiding officer's control over proceedings and set strict timelines for witness examination. The case was adjourned for four weeks to progress on 11 out of 21 witnesses. Parties were directed to update the court on examination progress for setting a final deadline. The court aimed for a proactive approach to resolve delays and listed further proceedings for 03.04.2023. en-us Mon, 27 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 01 Jun 2023 20:36:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308137 The High Court addressed delays in cross-examining witnesses in multiple writ petitions. The Respondent Department denied responsibility for the delay, emphasizing the need to expedite appeals. The court highlighted the presiding officer's control over proceedings and set strict timelines for witness examination. The case was adjourned for four weeks to progress on 11 out of 21 witnesses. Parties were directed to update the court on examination progress for setting a final deadline. The court aimed for a proactive approach to resolve delays and listed further proceedings for 03.04.2023. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 27 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=308137